In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
It is true that although agriculture improved significantly, there are still many people suffering from starvation in the world. There are several reasons why many people go hungry, and the government can take steps to address this issue.
In my opinion, two main factors are to blame for the condition that many people are suffering from starvation. Firstly, there is a huge gap between the rich and poor. Developed countries have advanced agriculture technology and have high production of crops and grains. But many developing countries with poor economic foundation are still in poverty. People there are poor, with no money to buy food. Secondly, the damage to the environment can also lead to starvation. The soil and water in some areas are seriously polluted, so people living here can not grow crops or grains.
The problem can be tackled with the effort of the government. For some poor countries, the government should take measures to develop their economy. And they can introduce in some advanced technology to enhance the crop production. And governments of all countries should make efforts to protect the environment. For example, laws need to be enacted to forbid factories to emit pollution to the soil and the water. Only in this way can we protect the condition of natural soil and water, ensuring the production of crops and grains.
In conclusion, the starvation problem will get worse unless governments take measures to enhance the crop production and protect the environment.
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- In many countries people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 71
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 56
- The charts below show the percentage of coffee production from different regions of consumption in different regions and of the profits in different fields in 2014
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16326530612 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77363682275 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.136361166 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.0625 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3125 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227332063695 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713011700566 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656703300802 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14396111112 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102474211109 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.