The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millions of tonnes, from three different sources, between 1990 and 2005.
The line graph illustrates the amount of emissions released into the air from industry, transport and households from 1990 to 2005. Units are measured in millions of tonnes.
Overall, it is clear that the total number of air pollutants experienced a gradual downward trend over the period shown. While the figures for industry and households decreased over the period, the figures for transport saw an increase.
In 1990, a total of nearly 8 million tonnes of air contaminants were emitted from the three mentioned sources, with the largest figure belonging to industry, at 6 million tonnes. The amount of pollutants due to transport and households were the same, at approximately 1 million tonnes each.
The total number of pollutants that were letting out into the air gradually reduced over the next fifteen years, which was a decline of about 5 million tonnes in total by 2005. Moreover, air pollutants from industrial activity also decreased over time, from the initial 6% then fell deeply to roughly 2 million tonnes in 2005. Despite the figures for households and transport being equal at the beginning of the period, the quantity of air pollutants from transport saw a small increase to 3 million tonnes by 2005, while air pollutants from households witnessed a drop to nearly zero in the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-03 | dinhthu05 | 73 | view |
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 90
- In many places people s lifestyle is changing rapidly and this affects family relationships Do you think the advantages of those developments outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Although more and more people read the news on the Internet newspaper will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people Do you agree or disagree 67
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree of disagree 78
- It is said that people who read books for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than people who watch TV Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04147465438 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70939526416 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506912442396 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2310366653 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.555555556 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332936730372 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153267725262 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850997820244 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213730853313 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996929821523 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.