Today food travels thousands of miles before it reaches customers. Why is this so? Is this a positive or negative trend?
In this era, food is transported through long routes before meeting its consumers. This development can take place thanks to the advancement in cooling technology applied in transportations and the increasing demands for food. Despite some trivial effects on the environment, this trend is generally positive
Food can be carried through mass distances is primitively contributed to the exponential demands of foodies and the evolution of technology for storing food. As the world is getting radically globalized, it is common to seek other cuisines besides one’s local specialty, therefore the need for food made from foreign countries escalates, entailing a greater amount of food traveling between nations. In addition, many modern machines and technology are specifically incorporated into modes of transportations to facilitate the process of cooling and freshening food. As a result, despite being transported through many countries, food can still keep its fresh when being seen on markets’ shelf
By and large, this activity brings a large scale of benefits to our society when food can not only be consumed in its region anymore, significantly decreasing the leftovers and escalate experiences of a variety of cuisines in the world. In fact, local food can be grown excessively and wastefully end up in rubbish bins without being eaten for a single time. However, with the capability of being exported to other nations, food would be utilized and consumed by a greater range of people, widening their choices and broadening their horizons about different dishes in the world. Although the development of delivering food in far distance results in the enormous amount of gas such as nitrogen and carbon dioxide released from transportations to the air, which is immensely devastating for the ecosystem, it is still dwarfed by the advantages mentioned above
To conclude, it is fascinating to see food traveling internationally before reaching its customers with the core fosters being people’s demand and technology. Although this development may carry the risk of increasing the carbon footprint, it is still positive for multiple reasons. The further the food is transported, the higher opportunities for people to enjoy distinctive cuisines in the world
- The graph below gives information about U S government spending on research between 1980 and 2008 78
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994 Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map shows the development of the village 73
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now 78
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The diagram illustrates how plastic bottles are recycled Overall the recycling of 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'The further the'. Did you mean 'further the'?
Suggestion: Further the
...is still positive for multiple reasons. The further the food is transported, the higher opportu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48295454545 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08904940713 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553977272727 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.130392666 49.4020404114 219% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 175.454545455 106.682146367 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200942813345 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860390135036 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517781265036 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152009370098 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077020309945 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.1 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.