The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the length of conversation via telephone by three different ways in the UK over the course of 7 years, starting in 1995.
Looking at the chart, it is immediately obvious that the amount of time which people spend to talk experienced an upward trend, with an exception of local telephone calls. However, it still was the highest figure over the period.
The minutes of local phone calls stood at 72 billion minutes at the beginning, which was nearly doubled to national and international telephone calls. Over the following four years, this figure rose steadily and reached the highest point of 90 billion minutes in 1999. Similarity, the number of minutes by foreign and global conversation and mobile underwent an increasing through the time. National and international telephone calls ascended from nearly 40 billion to 50 million, while mobile phone calls lasted for just more than 10 billion minutes.
In the remnant years, there was a contrast between three categories. The amount of time talking through local dip gradually to more than 70 billion minutes, which was equivalent to the beginning. Unlike local, national and international ascended continually and peaked at just over than 60 billion minutes. There was a similar trend in mobile phone calls, it grew dramatically and reached a peak at the end of period by approximately 45 billion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-14 | dkhnh_2603 | view | |
| 2022-06-22 | dkhnh_2603 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | chi150901 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | longtran | 81 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | longtran | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You sh 82
- Too much emphasis is placed on testing these days The need to prepare for tests and examinations is a restriction on teachers and also exerts unnecessary pressure on young learners How far do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- H
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14732142857 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77725578819 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540178571429 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8211142424 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.818181818 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144001093406 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569364369134 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408569937412 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899752445571 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512889138715 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.