Recent studies have shown that overweight people tend to eat junk food that has the highest in fat some people argue that increases in the price of such food will serve to reduce the amount of overweight people. To do you agree or disagree?
Owing to the problems about obesity is rising day by day. Due to the consumption of saturated foods individuals gain massive weight. However, few humans debate that if we expand the cost of fatty food, so it will distract them and even it turn down the number of oversize persons. I completely disagree with the idea of enlarging the food cost for reducing the bulkiness of people.
- [ ] To commence with, there are a plethora of drawbacks to expanding the rate of food. Firstly, it will not impact human beings those who are used to consume dehydrated food, as they have a habit of eating this kind of food, such as pizza, burgers, Chinese and so on, and even if some people find it the high amount they still would want to buy it. Secondly, if we elaborating on the food charge it may have some negative effects on the economy of the country. Although, these junk food restaurants are supporting millions of families since the industry has given work to chefs, waiters, and managers. Thus, expensive foodstuff will bring a difficult situation for those who work in this Industry.
In addition, an expensive item does indeed make the consumer think twice before they buy, but I believe it can never bring a total solution to this problem. Furthermore, only a few people will understand the harmful effects of such food and also they will reduce its intake. To illustrate, I loved to eat junk foods every weekend, but when I realized that consuming unhygienic fats will destroy our health, so I had to give up this habit and even one of my friend had to stopped eating fast food when his doctor told him that his asthma attack was a result of overeating which caused unhealthy weight gain. Therefore, expanding the fee of food is not a proper solution to tackle this issue.
In conclusion, I believe that increasing the rate of junk food is not going to decrease the obesity of humankind, as it will not impact them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-18 | jamini patel | 76 | view |
- Recent studies have shown that overweight people tend to eat junk food that has the highest in fat some people argue that increases in the price of such food will serve to reduce the amount of overweight people To do you agree or disagree 76
- Should young children be encouraged to follow a strict aet of rules based on culture and traditions or should they be allowed to behave freely Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Zoos should be merely meant for entertainment or should there be some other purpose also Discuss and give your opinion 71
- Some people say history is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in todays world subjects like science and technology are more important than history Discuss both the views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'turns'?
Suggestion: turns
...d, so it will distract them and even it turn down the number of oversize persons. I ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 3, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space after the opening parenthesis
Suggestion: [
... reducing the bulkiness of people. - [ ] To commence with, there are a plethora...
^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sumer think twice before they buy, but I believe it can never bring a total solut...
^^
Line 4, column 645, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in. Therefore, expanding the fee of food is not a proper solution to tackle this ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... proper solution to tackle this issue. In conclusion, I believe that increasing...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67551622419 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50270022774 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598820058997 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.3626425776 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.214285714 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264728485783 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860310959934 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635498082969 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157172886115 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421728764686 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.