The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.
The graph above illustrates data about the total earnings per year of three bakeries located in London over a decade between 2000 and 2010.
Generally, what stands out from the chart is that there were significant upward trends in the income of Bernie's Buns and Robbie's Bakery, whereas Lovely Loaves witnessed a substantial decline over the years. Another interesting point to mention is that despite holding the highest spot of the three bakeries throughout the first half of the decade, Lovely Loaves's earning remarkably worsen in the second half.
Based on the charts, in 2000, Bernie's Bun earned 20000 pounds, which meant that it had the smallest income of the three bakeries that year, while Lovely Loaves earned the most with just over 80000 pounds, followed by RB with respectively at 59000. During the first half of the decade, Robbie's Bakery's earnings remained stable at around under 60000 pounds, whereas that of the other bakeries fluctuated considerably. Lovely Loaves experienced a sharp drop in 2005 with the earning of 60000 pounds, in spite of peaking in sales last year with almost 100000 pounds in income. In 2010, Robbie's Bakery earned the most out of the three bakeries with over 100000 pounds.
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of living in a large city 56
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 73
- People generally know that the environment is important However most individuals still don t take responsibility to protect the environment Why is this What should ben done to encourage people to protect the environment 84
- The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in London in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The environmental problems facing today s world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation Governments and large companies should be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment To what 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, whereas, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06467661692 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32524135473 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582089552239 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3820770386 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.428571429 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300421875989 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162488915668 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151874007102 0.0843802449381 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250048584556 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172343012911 0.0819641961636 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.