Some people think employers should not care about the way their employees dress, but the quality at work.
To what extent you agree or disagree?
The question whether dresscodes should be eliminated in company has provoken controversial arguments. A number of people argue that employers should evaluate employees upon the efficiency of their work, rather than the clothes they wear. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this viewpoint, moreover, I believe appearance does plays a pivotal role in improving the quality of work.
For a start, dressing in formal clothes provides professional looks for the company, which is a proof for brand reputation and a factor to attract the investors and business partners. Undoubtedly, the first impression of a person about something is its appearance. Therefore, if a brand provides the first impression of a professional work environment with employees taking their jobs serious, the investors will have a favorable trust toward the company. As first impression is crucial, this will lead to future fruitful cooperation.
Another point to consider is that an promising employee need to have skills as well as good attitudes, and the way people dress displays their personalities and their attitudes toward the occupation. Appearance is crucial for not only a company, but also for a contestant in the recruitment. In fact, if you are interviewing for a job, you get no bonus point if you dress in formal clothes, but a guy in casual outfit will get a minus point, as it shows that he has no respect toward the employers and he doesn’t take this job seriously. Therefore, no matter how excellent his work quality is, there are chances he will not be recruited as his inappropriate attitudes, which can be told based on his clothes.
In conclusion, although work efficiency is top-priority in assessing an employee, appearance still play a role in the process. Therefore, dressing in formal clothes can make an employee look professional and prove the attitude of him toward the work.
- In many countries governments are spending a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems Others however believe technology is the way to solve these problems Discuss both views and give you 67
- Some people say that individuals who make a lot of money are the most successful Others think that those who contribute to society like scientists and teachers are more successful Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "The question"?
Suggestion: Whether
The question whether dresscodes should be eliminated in comp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
.... Another point to consider is that an promising employee need to have skills ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18566775244 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03744487426 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553745928339 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5764307429 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.461538462 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216126419673 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706075886364 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599394185572 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127521900609 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536131012485 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.