The most important consideration when choosing any career or job is having a high income.
To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
It is a prevalent belief that earning tremendous wage should be taken in to account initially when decide which career path or occupation to take. This essay will address why I don’t stand for this and provide reasons below.
On the one hand, prioritization of immense earnings from the first place will likely to make one suffer from being exploited. Given that higher income comes at a cost, which is having to work much more laboriously than the people doing nine to five jobs. Furthermore, the lack of time to wind down, owning to the never-ending work, might exacerbate the mental and physical weariness from the work place. Japan and Korea exemplify these with their foreign labors, who earn more there than in their hometown, being forced to labor until exhaustion day by day.
On the other hand, some only look at the tip of the iceberg and refer having high salary to a satisfying life. People deeming that way only notice the materialistic values at the time and ignore sentimentally unworthiness in long term. The amount of time and effort must be spent for a rewarding job in this regard has a high chance to deprive one of spending time with the close ones. Albeit family could become affluent, fractures in the bond between members due to ages of separation may be inevitable. Cases of married couples cheating on each other when the other half chooses career over love and works nonstop, are prime examples.
To conclude, getting paid well leads to over-exploitation and manipulates people to see it as a worthy trade off. Therefore, I stand against the idea of making engaging income the paramount aspect when seek for jobs or commence a career
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-05 | trinhthanh1 | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-26 | kquynk | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Hypnogogic | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | iawg | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | Tran Thanh Binh | 67 | view |
- The maps show the outskirts of the town of Fosbury in 1980 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 11
- The bar chart shows the percentages of UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releant 78
- Some believe that people today have no interest in maintaining the traditional culture of their country or region Other believe that it is still important to people that we preserve a traditional way of life Discuss both these views and give your own opin 89
- The bar chart shows the percentages of UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85314685315 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58764882686 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653846153846 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.3525375612 49.4020404114 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.769230769 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123574577087 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400221645561 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476983357013 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0710471969526 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287209885567 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85314685315 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58764882686 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653846153846 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.3525375612 49.4020404114 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.769230769 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123574577087 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400221645561 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476983357013 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0710471969526 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287209885567 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.