Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones.
How important is it to maintain old buildings?
Should history stand in the way of progress?
In many countries, numerous monuments have been maintaining with the authorities as they have historical worth. However, a few people opine that such old buildings should be substituted with new ones. In the following, two main reasons will be mentioned disapproving their idea.
To begin with, monuments identify the culture and identity of people in a country. In fact, old-fashioned buildings show individuals how their ancestors lived in the past. Moreover, such buildings can develop tourism industry. To explain clearly, some people are keen on to increase their knowledge about countries’ history. To achieve this goal, they would travel to other countries to visit such places.
Nevertheless, a few individuals believe to promote a community, the history should be ignored. In contrast, some other people think that keeping the culture and custom alive can assist the community to progress. To support their view, they refer to the tourism industry. To illustrate this vividly, the existence of such ancient places entice tourists to travel to other countries. In this way, the economy of countries would improve as visitors spend money for transportation, accommodation, and food. Indeed, the governments are able to utilize that money to provide amenities for their fellow citizens.
To conclude, although the authorities should construct modern buildings, historical ones should not be destroyed as they have benefits for the society. Firstly, they are part of a nation history and show next generation their identity. Moreover, they encourage foreigners to visit such places and thus, they reinforce tourism industry.
- In the past many people had skills such as making their own clothes and doing repairs to things in the house In many countries nowadays skills like these are disappearing 73
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine However at best these methods are ineffective and at worst they may be dangerous To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
- You ordered an item from an online store and it has arrived damaged Write a letter to the retailer to complain In the letter Explain why you are unhappy Request a refund Make arrangements to return the damaged item
- In many places new homes are needed but the only space available for building them is in the countryside Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there What is your opinion about this 89
- Some people argue that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o other countries to visit such places. Nevertheless, a few individuals believe ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... thus, they reinforce tourism industry.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, in contrast, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.556 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89719588568 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.7188320281 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.7058823529 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7058823529 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274982588369 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772936698331 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646016329381 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162067650075 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332548783175 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.