It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environments, such as the South Pole. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development?
In the recent era, the flourishing touch of technology has changed the communication sector. Not only the scientists but also the general people can visit places in every corner of the world. It has created huge opportunities for the common public to learn about a new culture and entertaining themselves and also for the researchers to explore new places. It has also some drawbacks, in the following paragraphs, both pros and cons will be discussed.
On the one hand, technology opens a new door to scientists to do research more and discover brand new places, and investigate their ecological systems. For example, nowadays researchers can go to the farthest corner of the world such as the North Pole where they can find unknown animals and collect data on their habitation. Moreover, in 2020, a research team find out 33 types of unknown viruses in the Greenland ice and now they're investigating their characteristics and try to find out whether these micro animals are useful to humans or can create a threat. This is possible because of the development of the global transportation system. In addition, people can travel to various places for refreshment and can learn about different cultural traditions and also can gather knowledge and can become acquainted with foreign languages. Furthermore, it creates a global business market.
On the other hand, sometimes it can be threatening for human beings, due to the more tourist in a certain place increasing the pollutant rate. For instance, in the coastal area, people throw plastic bags and bottles which contaminated the water and destroy the water environmental system and also decrease the bio-diversity. A similar trend for the scientific experiments sometimes investigation can be a reason for the extinction of a species.
In conclusion, technological improvement is a blessing for human beings but we the people should have to use it carefully, so that, in the future, it can not turn into a danger for us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-06 | Sanaullah97 | 84 | view |
| 2021-03-17 | Nhungmeow246 | 84 | view |
| 2015-04-19 | Sanaz86 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people Others think that it is causing the opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 73
- There are more cars on the roads these days and more accidents are happening As a result some politicians have suggested that people should take regular driving tests throughout their lives rather than one single test What do you think are the advantages 81
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...wn viruses in the Greenland ice and now theyre investigating their characteristics and...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12037037037 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04023939116 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577160493827 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7404861898 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12862274799 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460405380403 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412703666757 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731495049634 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232577641473 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.