In the future robots may do more of the work that is done by humans today. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
The future competition between robots and humans has been much debated recently. Evidence suggests that more of the work could be done by robots rather than humans in the future. Although there are a number of benefits accruing from this development, I believe the drawbacks involved are more.
On the plus side, there are some advantages to using robots. To begin with, robots never get tired and do not need to have a break. In other words, on the contrary to humans who need to rest on a regular basis, machines can work for a prolonged time with succession. Clearly, this can boost the efficiency of production lines and other parts of a company. Another positive aspect of using robots is that they are less likely to make mistakes. Take those machines being used in industrial organizations as an example; since they can be programmed before doing their tasks, they are able to carry out the tasks more accurately. Admittedly, they have some errors, but they are minor and can be solved immediately.
Despite the aforementioned advantages, robots doing more of the work has serious consequences. The most axiomatic argument is concerned with people being laid off by their employers. This is mainly because the more job prospects shrink in favor of robots, the fewer job vacancies are available for humans, and in turn, the less need is felt by employers to keep their human workers. Obviously, after being made redundant, these workers will find it a struggle to earn a decent living. As a result, they probably turn to crime in order to cover their expenses. In addition, robots cannot be always reliable; in cases when there is no electricity, they will be useless.
In conclusion, irrespective of the benefits of jobs being done more by robots, I think it can be more problematic for humans. Provisions should also be made to ensure that humans’ job prospects are in first priority in job markets in future societies.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 89
- Write a letter to your friend in another country where you would like to visit for the holidays In your letter you should Explain your travel plans Describe the interesting places you plan to visit Ask for suggestions for sightseeing options 73
- You recently noticed a local restaurant that was offering a part time job Write a letter to the restaurant s manager In your letter explain that you would like to apply for the job give some details of any relevant experience that you have specify the day 84
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- Your office building doesn t have parking available Write a letter to the manager In your letter Explain the problem Suggest a solution Say why parking will benefit all employees 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8993902439 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68797854503 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576219512195 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7514136818 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2777777778 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242725489601 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785748979907 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730493729908 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159569126639 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059617308458 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.