Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
There can be no doubt that the topic of remote learning and working is one which deserves some analysis. It is the opinion of this writer that this phenomenon is a positive development. This essay will substantiate the writer's position with three main points: the pressure on utility supply, alleviated climate change, and better work-life balance.
On the one hand, home-based work and schooling can exaggerate the strain on utility supply. One possible explanation for this is the increasing demand for electricity. Since electric devices, namely laptops and mobile phones, serve various professional and recreational purposes simultaneously for all family members, the electricity usage may skyrocket. As a consequence, this may result in an accelerating pressure on the supply of electricity.
On the other hand, working virtually can help mitigate climate change issues. This is because when people work from home, theere will be less traffic congestion due to the decreased need to commute. Furthermore, it is undeniable that traffic jam is one of the main contributors to global warming. Therefore, the less traffic there is, the more beneficial it will be for the environment. This holds great significance because it would greatly assist in lessening the effect of natural catastrophes, namely hurricanes.
Additionally, one more benefit that it produces is better management of work-life aspects. On the grounds that people can minimize such unnecessary time budget as commute time, they can gain a more flexible control of time for other categories. To illustrate, because clerical workers may travel less to their offices, they would be able to expend more time on leisure, developing bonds with their families, and engaging in desired online courses that fit their schedule. As a result, they will have ample chances to enhance their life quality.
It can be seen that although home-based work and schooling may pose an increasing strain on utility supply, it assists in alleviating climate change problems and offers more optimal work-life management. The ample evidence and reasons provided can conclude that this phenomenon is a positive development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | Nguyen144202 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | oanh2020 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | maidiem.1508 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | thanhbinh | 61 | view |
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- Many people choose to work or live abroad because of the higher standards of living they can find outside their home country Do you think this brings more advantages or disadvantages to the people who follow this path 84
- Memorising facts is the most important way to succeed in education To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some people think books are losing importance as a source of information and entertainment 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... On the other hand, working virtually can help mitigate climate change issues....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47181008902 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93551158964 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545994065282 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8409757938 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.444444444 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180021493687 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571701979586 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454335405762 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102987538229 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308410561511 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.