The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the information about the favorite TV channels of different age groups in a European nation in 2012.
Overall, while cartoons were being interested the most by children aged 11-15, two remaining age groups enjoyed watching feature films during the period shown.
In terms of 11-15-year-old group, 29% children preferred seeing cartoons to other programs, followed by sports, at 22%. Meanwhile, the percentages of children spent time watching feature films and soap opera were 18% and 17% respectively, compared to only 8% on TV dramas. At the same time, the figure for News was merely 6%, which was much lower than the proportion of teenagers aged 15-20, at roughly 19%.
In terms of the age group of 21-25, only 4% of citizens aged 21-25 watched cartoons, compared to around 23% on News which was the highest figure in this age group. Additionally, the proportions of individuals who were 15 to 20 years old on feature films and sports accounted for approximately 23% and 18% respectively.
- TASK 2 Online communication is becoming more popular than face to face communication in many companies Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 89
- The chart and table below give information about what nursing graduates did after finishing their course in the UK in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think it is a positive or negative development 87
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can governments take to solve these problems 89
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13173652695 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8385886331 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634730538922 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.7136752025 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.428571429 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176470328711 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945224600955 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101307861609 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143765962217 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110285888809 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.