Some people think that with the increasing use of mobile phones and computers, people lose the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, humans use mobile phones and computers more frequently than in the past, leading to the loss of ability to meet face to face for communicating. I totally agree with this viewpoint because phones and computers users can be in contact with others with the help of social media and many online-meeting apps.
First, with a smartphone or a computer, the users can download various online-meeting apps. They can see the other people clearly through the screen of their device and start a conversation from remote areas. For instance, the two friends from two different countries can take the advantage of Zalo - an application where people can make a normal call or a video call to chat with each other on a daily basis. They may find it convenient as they just need to own a phone or a computer and do not need to travel a long distance to have a face-to-face meeting. Having perceived the benefits of those electronic devices, humans now spend plenty of time on them for conversation instead of going outside for a meeting.
Moreover, some people may find it wastes a large amount of time travelling to the meeting place. For instance, a man has to book a flight to come back to his country just because his mother misses him and wants to meet him. It can take several hours for him to go back home and then fly back to his current address. However , he can use a mobile phone or a computer to make a video call with his mother. As a result, he can save time and money and his mother can meet him online. Other people may want to spend time doing things that they want instead of wasting time travelling, so they may use a phone or a personal computer for texting and calling.
In conclusion, because phones, computers and other devices can save one's money and time to make a conversation, more people use it and reduce the time of meeting face-to-face. Despite the fact that when spending too much time on them, humans' eyes and muscles may suffer strain, I am of the opinion that their benefits may outweigh the drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-10 | duyenle1001 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-06 | LUCIALUSO | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | LUCIALUSO | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | binhan_04 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-14 | nghiemngoc2912 | 73 | view |
- Which covid 19 vaccine is the most widely accepted for international travel 89
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 73
- Some people think that with the increasing use of mobile phones and computers people lose the ability to communicate face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- There is a trend of increasing competitiveness in today s society In your opinion is it a good or a bad development 67
- Research suggests that majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes when set free What are the reasons What can be done to solve the problem 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...fly back to his current address. However , he can use a mobile phone or a computer...
^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s, computers and other devices can save ones money and time to make a conversation, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56284153005 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5632764857 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502732240437 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9502598439 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225662625592 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844132318717 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798226315378 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160165596301 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595793881018 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.