Parents should not allow their children to eat fast food. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons to your answer and provide examples from your experience or knowledge.Write at least 250 words
Unhealthy eating habits have recently become the primary reason for obesity among
western countries. It is argued children ought to be forbidden to consume junk food by
their mothers and fathers. I totally agree with this statement and believe that fast food is
considered to be expensive and harmful.
Firstly, children are going to suffer from health issues caused by fast food intake. This is
because this kind of food contains processed genetically modified substances which in
their turn do not digest. Therefore, young organism’s development decelerates due to
the fact that they lack essential nutrients which they could otherwise acquire from organic
food. For example, the research conducted by Russian Medical University concluded that
20% of the children who were exposed to excessive consumption of junk food developed
serious chronic diseases that were highly likely to deteriorate their future life. In other
words, if parents want their children to be happy, they should restrict unhealthy food
consumption from their children’s lives.
Secondly, purchasing fast food in such restaurants as McDonald’s, KFC, Burger King, etc.
is usually a habit, so children regularly spend money on it. It means that some younglings
tend to save pocket money for an unhealthy treat after school instead of buying lunch in
the canteen. For instance, a local school in Moscow region did a research which has
proved that the quantity of students purchasing food on campus is almost twice smaller
than regular teenage visitors of a nearby KFC restaurant. Thus, preventing younger
generation from buying the junk food will also contribute a lot in family’s savings.
In conclusion, I am definitely sure that parents are responsible for stopping their children
from eating fast food as it is certainly dangerous for health and requires big amounts of
money.
- Some think that current generation should take steps to protect the environment for the next generation Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that money is the most important factor for achieving happiness However others believe that happiness has nothing to do with money Agree or disagree 67
- Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces Do you think the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 11
- Because of the progress in medicine people are living longer now Do you think the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 67
- Some people believe that death penalty is the best method for those who committed violent crimes Other people think that this measure is not appropriate in today s world Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50511945392 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7246954572 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641638225256 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.268342157 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.214285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 22.0 4.38176352705 502% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211116448166 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754530804899 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521545140414 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612578540703 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494442416016 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.