Some people say that we do not need printed newspapers any more. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
That offline newspapers become less commonplace in our society has been happening naturally. Personally, despite their popularity reduction, printed newspaper remains an unchangeable form of mass media in all over the world for some reasons.
First of all, traditional newspapers has been gradually replaced by online types; nevertheless, many people cannot read news online, as a result, printed copies would certainly be a suitable option to acquire information. Some residents reside in remote areas where Internet is hard to be installed, and the only way to know about the world is to purchase printed newspapers. In addition, because a great number of people afford appropriate devices in difficulty in order to come nearer to information sources, they have to learn about reality by the traditional newspapers which are inconvenient to some extent but inexpensive and affordable.
Moreover, it is obvious that perusing information in newspaper is better for health than in electronic equipment like smart phones, computers, and tablets. When individuals read anything online, their eyes will be hurt after a long period of time. In long term, the eyes can suffer from some sorts of diseases such as eyestrain or visual impairment that would cost an individual a great deal of money. In comparison, only if people go through offline newspapers with the shortage of light or in inappropriate sitting patterns does the printed newspaper detrimentally influence on their health and life. As a matter of fact, doctors and professionals also regularly advise individuals to read offline rather than online.
In conclusion, however obsolete traditional tabloids or journals or magazines become, human beings cannot refuse their importance and existence. Not only is printed newspaper an affordable form of mass media for most people, but it also does not cause detrimental shift for people’s health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 84
- Every day millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 84
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 80
- NOWADAYS FOOTBALL SUPPORTERS BEHAVE VIOLENTLY WHAT IS THE CAUSE AND HOW DO WE SOLVE IT 11
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 429, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to appropriate'
Suggestion: to appropriate
...because a great number of people afford appropriate devices in difficulty in order to come ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e, their eyes will be hurt after a long period of time. In long term, the eyes can suffer from...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46440677966 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97708185554 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8980657422 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140775428301 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049608703881 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401944157033 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861408424893 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218210840358 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.