The chart below compares the responses of undergraduates and postgraduates to a questionnaire on their opinion about their university library. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the opinions of the students on the range of books and the non-printed materials in the university library based on a questionnaire.
It is evident that a considerable number of postgraduates choose “not good” for the range of books. Whereas, for non-printed materials such as computer software or online journals over half of the undergraduates rated it as “very good” and nearly half of the postgrads found it as “satisfactory.”
In the chart for variety of books at the library, one third of the undergraduates were not happy and marked it as “not good” compared to a startling 65% by the postgraduate. Further, only a small fraction of postgrads around 15% responded as “very good” for collections in comparison to 39% of the undergraduates. Overall, below 30% of the students in both categories rating the selection as “satisfactory”.
With regards to the non printed materials at the library, over half the undergraduates’ responses reveal it as “very good” compared to the postgraduate’s response at 27%. While the “satisfactory” rating topped the responses by the postgrad students, but undergraduates was at 33%. The percentage of student responses for “not good” as selection for computer software or online journals was lowest for both student sets.
- The chart below compares the responses of undergraduates and postgraduates to a questionnaire on their opinion about their university library Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- It is sometimes said that people should change career at least once in their life rather than doing the same kind of job all their working life Do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart below compares the responses of undergraduates and postgraduates to a questionnaire on their opinion about their university library Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- Many people try to look younger than they really are For what reasons do you think people try to look younger than they are Is it a good thing or a bad thing 67
- The table and chart give information on pilots in 3 years Summarize information report main feature and compare relevant information 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e postgrads found it as “satisfactory.” In the chart for variety of books at the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, third, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4347826087 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.63923660056 2.65546596893 137% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507246376812 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.1800400034 43.030603864 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 140.625 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139255851279 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683799248816 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335653402736 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932795087096 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346583306596 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.