Government should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment. Do you agree or disagree?
Since time immemorial, governments promulgate effective rules to protect the environment; numerous residents, however, are reluctant to follow them. Therefore, I concur with this stance that authorities should raise citizens’ awareness to preserve their surrounding environment because of some compelling reasons.
On the one hand, some opponents of this vantage point presume that individual actions are often inefficient in comparison to official measures. As a result, locals are unable to protect the environment. Individual activities, however, may be more impactful in reality. For instance, the consumption of fossil fuels and the quantity of contaminated air will be lowered if everyone avoids driving their own automobile for short trips and instead takes public transportation, walks, or cycles. Another case of this point is that each person has stopped using plastic bags because they are a hazardous pollutant to the environment, and rather than opt for eco-friendly alternatives such as paper or cloth bags. These examples demonstrate that individuals can make a significant contribution to environmental protection.
Furthermore, authorities make people accountable for environmental protection being advantageous owing to the close proximity to the environment . First, governments seem not to have as profound insight of each area's environmental situation as local residents, thus when they give some regulations which cannot be accurate for each location. Additionally, allowing people to make their own decision and implement environmental actions that are appropriate for their circumstances can serve to respond to and improve the situation.
To sum up, when it comes to environmental problems, individual actions are indispensable in the problem solving process, therefore, governments should enforce inhabitants’ awareness to preserve humans’ atmosphere.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-23 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | phiennn | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-31 | tinavuuuu | 73 | view |
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 73
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss and give your opinion 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps give information about a university sports court 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...tection being advantageous owing to the close proximity to the environment . First, government...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...o the close proximity to the environment . First, governments seem not to have as...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05970149254 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37825163758 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652985074627 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6316526565 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205917379158 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715806016807 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581294833703 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119715547468 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656928573471 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.16 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.