It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote environments, such as the south pole. Do you agree or disagree with this development?
In recent decades, there has been a growing trend towards traveling to remote natural areas for a myriad of purposes. Although this trend appears to be of concern to some activists, scientists and thrill-seekers should be encouraged to study and explore there.
Scientists in different fields ought to travel to areas like the south pole to scrutinize and protect them. First on-site research gives students and scientists the chance to get hold of unknown knowledge and information about the earth. This benefits not only those who do the research but also the society as a whole, as there will be more answers to the current state of global warming. Second, most scientists endeavored to reach remote areas to learn how to conserve them from other humans. In fact, If there had not been any valid data gathered from the interaction of humans and the environment for the public and research, there would have been some accidental damages to the areas caused by other individuals.
There are also several merits for traveling-seekers to visit isolated natural environments. One of those benefits is that visitors get to enjoy once in a lifetime experience. For example, those who take a trip to the South pole will have a chance to immerse themselves in the exotic atmosphere and experience the wilderness of the environment. In addition, by taking refuge in natural surroundings, travelers will be able to forge a higher appreciation for nature. In fact, a substantial number of tourists and students have chosen to become environmental advocates or activists after a trip to the South pole, which aims to raise the awareness of public over the climate change issues
In conclusion, traveling to far-distant natural areas does good to students, scientists, and the world at large in many ways. On the condition that there is no sabotage or disruption to the original state of nature, everyone should be welcomed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-28 | chinh11111 | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-24 | vungochuyen25 | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-24 | Nhungmeow246 | 78 | view |
- Obesity is an increasing public health problem in some parts of the world Explain some possible reasons for this problem and suggest some solutions 56
- Young people who commit crimes should be treated the same way as adults Agree or disagree 84
- There are more advertisements aimed at children Some people believe that they have negative effects on children and should be banned Do you agree or disagree 84
- Topic Some people think that using mobile phones and computers has a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that all college students should study whatever they like Others believe they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both of these views and give 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ublic over the climate change issues In conclusion, traveling to far-distant na...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, as for, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0917721519 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89493663967 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1752874764 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.769230769 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200414736419 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663202966443 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412867107111 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106296482688 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493300488661 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.