Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that TV programmes and movies now play an important role in a country’s culture. Despite the unequivocal benefits of international films and TV programmes, I believe that locally-made products are an irreplaceable part of a country’s film industry.
On the one hand, there are those who argue that it is necessary to import movies and TV shows from overseas. The core of this argument is that people can acquire new knowledge about other countries. International films are a huge repository of information about foreign cultures, traditions and customs. Thus, watching foreign movies and TV programmes is an efficient way to discover other unique cultures, culinary arts and beautiful destinations. For instance, audiences can learn how American people celebrate Thanksgiving by watching sitcoms such as How I met your mother, even if they never set foot on foreign land. This explains why a country should broadcast internationally films and TV shows.
On the other hand, I side with those who concur that it would be better to produce domestic movies and TV programmes. The salient argument is that locally-made films and TV programmes play essential role on preserving a country’ culture. In contemporary society, due to the penetration of foreign products, more young people have superficial knowledge about their culture. Thus, local movies and TV programmes may remind citizens of their nation's traditional customs and values. For example, students can learn about their country’s history through a documentary movies made locally. In contrast, overexposure on exotic products are likely to make traditional values consigned to oblivion.
In conclusion, I effusively hold the view that international movies and TV programmes pale in comparison to domestic ones when it comes to contribute to a country' culture. Therefore, a country should produce more entertaining works by their own.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-13 | suaadma6 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | Tran Bao Long | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-04 | Tran Bao Long | 61 | view |
| 2020-02-11 | hoangquyen1904 | 89 | view |
| 2017-11-06 | Murphet | 78 | view |
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- Explain some ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can government do to address the environmental problems What can individual people do 78
- Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes Others think that it is better to produce these locally Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes Others think that it is better to produce these locally Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'movie'?
Suggestion: movie
...country’s history through a documentary movies made locally. In contrast, overexposure...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44107744108 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14861445258 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552188552189 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5986493779 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279190847378 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923137359928 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450010848306 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174955922782 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230979240879 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.