Museum and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
For offering the multifaceted knowledge museums and art galleries are the best sources for plebeians. Therefore, these institutions should primarily focus on their local history and global art. However, I largely agree with this notion as historical works provide various utilities to the people.
Commenting with the most salient and prominent factor behind this phenomenon is, the extinction of cultural identity. What is more, if the western culture had mixed-up with local culture, no one would have able to differentiate between the real and overseas identity of a country. Along with it, the upcoming generations would encounter an arduous task to take in about their annals and ancestors as well. Apart from it, the museums are a hab of cultures. Thereby, the foreign culture would penetrate the native and indigenous culture undoubtedly. Due to this, the public interest may beame loose in their own traditions as well as it would affect the language and intellectual cability of the individuals.
Although the museums and galleries not having any boundary limits, in contrast, demonstrating the past about the utter globe, would accelerate the tourism in a nation. As these buildings exhibit both the local and global art and craft, it would be uncomplicated to find the diversity of tradition and culture on a single place. To justify it, there is an epitome of "Louvre museum", the World's largest museum located in France, has illustrated the entire world's history and prestigious scluptures in it for knowledge craving people. Despite it, this kind of arrangement needs a lot of space together with an awful amount of expenses too. Hence, to show the foreign and native cultures is not a facile job.
To conclude, art galleries have a significant role in awaring masses about their past annals. Owing to this, these institutions should Concentrate on their own nation's history and culture as well so that the traditional values stay alive for the future age peer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-06 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | chaupnh | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | baokhuyen759 | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | doquytuan | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
- In many countries more and more people are compating for a place to study in universities Why does this happen Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Nowadays it is easy to apply for and and give a credit Card However some people experience problems when they are not able to pay their debts back In your opinion the advantages of credit cards outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Museum and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Some people think it is not necessary for adults to receive education in class Self study is a good way for them to study more effectively To what extend do You agree or disagree 84
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays them in the past Is this a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'Worlds the largest'.
Suggestion: Worlds the largest
...itome of 'Louvre museum', the Worlds largest museum located in France, has illustrat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...d in France, has illustrated the entire worlds history and prestigious scluptures in i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, apart from, in contrast, kind of, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.215625 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8287568355 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6958264207 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229615097957 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694883617741 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393557792782 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147537728206 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419089656202 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.