Do you prefer visiting popular places with many tourists or places with fewer people?
Which one is worth visiting, popular places or places with fewer people? When it comes to the question, answers differ from individual to individual. Some are adamant that popular places have more interesting factors to visit, while others hold the opposite statement. Both statements are convincing and stand on points, yet my experience and real-life example lead me to conclude that I prefer to visit popular places. More reasons and examples will be shed light on as follows.
To begin with, budget plays in essential role when I visit to other places, and popular places usually are less expensive. For example, tickets of scenic areas or historical sites are cheap, which usually only about 5 dollars, and it makes visitors are affordable to pay for these tickets. To be more specific, people always prefer good value, so these places usually have innumerable tourists. However, expensive tickets cause people hesitate because they can’t promise that they will enjoy this place. Therefore, going to popular is more desirable decision for me.
In addition, I prefer to visit the place, which is convenient to go, and popular places usually are convenient. For instance, there are many ways such as MRT and bus to arrive to The Palace Museum, which contains valuable cultural relics. Foreigners or outsiders who do not have cars or motorcycles can easily to get there, so every day has substantial number of people to visit the Palace Museum. On the contrary, places which are on the mountain or in the rural areas are hard to arrive, so few of tourists can arrive there. I am just a student who don’t have any vehicle; hence, those popular places are suitable choice for me.
Last but not least, it is pivotal for me to visit the place which is interesting or spectacular, and popular places can achieve this goal. Take previous example, accordance with the record made by the Palace Museum, over thousands of people visit there to appreciate the valuable and full-historical cultural relics. Thus, it attracts me to go there every year to enjoy the delicate antiques. By contrast, some sites which have fewer people mean that there isn’t something worth visiting. Hence, it doesn’t appeal me to visit these places with fewer places.
In conclusion, I tend to visit popular sites. It is because that the budget, convenience and interesting are my point to consider.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-02 | amirmn | 76 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | barrypr14 | 83 | view |
| 2021-03-06 | yasaman-pooshidani | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-06 | yasaman-pooshidani | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | saamaan | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework whereas in the district of Marlee most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no mo 54
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01767676768 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57169788014 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532828282828 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9032503881 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3181818182 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42573282989 0.236089414692 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125039214914 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118718838055 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233800444511 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861211153957 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.