Many parents today organize extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends. Do you feel that this is a worthwhile thing to do or do you feel children have enough education at school?
The omnipresent pressure of procuring flying colors has fueled toxic competition among students and sparked parents’ concern over their studies. Consequently, today witnesses a precipitous climb in the number of extra classes for children. While adults feel more secure when their kids participate in these supplementary lessons; I am at loggerheads with the idea of keeping children’s timetables occupied.
As a student ranking third in my class, I can assert that classes after school yield no promising outcome should pupils deem lessons tedious and unprepossessing. This is not an anecdotal statement; although I do not take lessons on weekends. I can attain higher grades than those who do. What piques my heed is that whenever students feel detached from the contents taught, they can not do their best no matter how assiduously they spend scrutinizing papers or doodling on jotters. Quality trumps quantity, to enhance students’ academic levels, there is more to execute than just compelling them to be in a cramped class and hoping against hope that they will gradually measure up to the set criteria.
On the other hand, begrudgingly attending these classes catalyzes miscellaneous bad habits. I have heard one case where instead of focusing on the teacher, a student mostly applied his time to playing smartphones hid beneath the table, which indicates that extra lessons not only fail to illuminate pupils but they also make them develop detrimental pastimes. In addition, that students start using classes after school as a pretext to go play games in some Internet booth happens egregiously rife these days. Parents, simultaneously, pin preposterous hopes on devoting a large number of their emoluments thinking it will benefit their kids, resulting in a pitiable situation.
To encapsulate, whether students joining extra classes will have better results or not depends on their will; if they love learning, there may be brighter things to come. Otherwise, parents should not force their children as it only leads to counter-productivity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-07 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | lucynton | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-04 | buiminhduc | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-04 | buiminhduc | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-21 | Nanddy | 73 | view |
- some people say that cellphones have improved humans life Others believe that cell phones have caused problems 84
- In the past lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students in a classroom Nowadays new technology is increasingly being used to teach students What are the advantages and disadvantages of this new approach in teaching Give reas 89
- The line graph below shows the population size birth and death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 78
- It is commonly thought that it is healthy for adults to maintain an outside interest in order to relax or stay fit Compare the advantages and disadvantages of 3 of the following sports and pastimes tennis walking museums a club a gym Give reasons for your 84
- Should we discourage people to use cars 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...sly, pin preposterous hopes on devoting a large number of their emoluments thinking it will benef...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, third, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40247678019 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01127480943 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684210526316 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2505145812 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.642857143 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247864691629 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783675671869 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440702526551 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137848422737 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407832270717 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.