School should not force children to learn a foreign language. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Some people are of the opinion that forcing kids to study a new language at school is not a recommended practice. I totally agree with the suggestion because forcing children may bring about detrimental consequences
When children must learn a new language early in life, they may experience extra pressure that hinders their development. It is scientifically proven that children are very prone to mental pressure when learning new knowledge unwillingly. Consequently, when children are forced to study a new tounge, it may affect their mental health negatively, leaving many counterproductive impacts afterwards. For example, languages are very complex to learn and some children may suffer from anxiety disorders when they have to deal with that complexity
Additionally, forcing children to acquire linguistic knowledge too early in life would affect their proficiency in their own mother tounge. In detail, it is promblematic for pupils to stay balance between two languages at the same time, they would be confused and mix them up regularly. As children are still often struggled with their own languages, forcing them to learn a new toungue could jeopardize their learning process. In the worst case, some children prefer to speak in foreign languages may have to cope with lacks of communication knowledge even in their daily converstations
To conclude, although forcing children to learn a new toungue at school is a common practive in most countries worldwide, some people still oppose it and so do I. As children’s mental health is fragile, adding extra pressure in the form of complex linguistic knowledge is not beneficial. Also, teaching children new languages too early can affect the process of accumulating their own languages
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-16 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2024-04-11 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-20 | Valentinka | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | phuonganh0810 | 89 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 89
- The table data shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the United Kingdom in 2005 73
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 78
- TASK 1 The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and the present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, may, so, still, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39272727273 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00294951425 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.8119908958 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.3 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26194927682 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117418201104 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613516269785 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183930883867 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246488625026 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.