The table gives information about the percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features
The table compares different utilities on smartphones from 2006 to 2010
Overall, it was making calls that was the most popular feature on smartphones, however, it was the only function that saw a decline in its usage. All other figures had an upward trend generally, and the data of searching the Internet and recording video in 2006 were unknown
Remarkably, people use mobile phones mainly for calling in all three years, with the highest proportion of 100%, but a small drop of 1% in the final year. Mobile phones in 2006 were also used widely for taking photos as well as sending and receiving text messages with the percentage of 66% and 73%, respectively. However, while the feature of taking photos witnessed an increase of 10%, it was only 6% for the other.
Games have apparently caught a lot of attention of phones owners, while there was a nearly fourfold surge in their uses, from 17% to 41%. Furthermore, although both searching the Internet and playing music were recorded with zero data in the beginning year, the use of the Internet doubled that of filming videos in 2010, which was almost 50% ( 73% and 35% respectively ). Finally, throughout the period playing music was seen with a twofold increase from 12% to 26%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-14 | Shohru_x | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | Taytor2609 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | minhtran224 | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-19 | Forhad Hossain Rabbi | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-19 | Forhad Hossain Rabbi | 73 | view |
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980s and 2010s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing videos in 2010, which was almost 50% 73% and 35% respectively . Finally, thro...
^^
Line 7, column 369, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...was almost 50% 73% and 35% respectively . Finally, throughout the period playing ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85849056604 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53031173229 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61320754717 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.7978980483 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.142857143 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2857142857 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 5.23603664747 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155895644452 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070434577011 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653447931337 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842637818505 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818685030794 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing videos in 2010, which was almost 50% 73% and 35% respectively . Finally, thro...
^^
Line 7, column 369, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...was almost 50% 73% and 35% respectively . Finally, throughout the period playing ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85849056604 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53031173229 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61320754717 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.7978980483 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.142857143 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2857142857 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 5.23603664747 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155895644452 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070434577011 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653447931337 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842637818505 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818685030794 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.