The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001.
The pictures illustrate many alterations in Felixstone in the UK from 1967 to 2001
Overall, several shifts took place throughout a 34-year period, largely were for tourism with the addition of accommodation and beaches along with the removal of previous infrastructure
In 1967, two lines of shop were situated between a golf course and a farmland. To the south, a western fish market was located opposite the farmland and in the northeast of a marina and a pier. On the west side of the map, dunes formed right next to a hotel which was adjacent to a café.
In 2001, farmland was removed to make way for a new area which consisted of a hotel to the right, a swimming pool to the left, and two tennis courts to the south. Beaches were constructed and separated into public and private sectors, replacing the fish market, marina and pier. Also, wind turbines were placed along the beachfront and a new car park was built on the left-hand side of the hotel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003 04 and 2013 14 Write a 150 word report for a university lecturer describing the data and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the information about medical care in three Europe countries between 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this happening How should they be punished 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72352941176 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58973886808 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582352941176 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.0644273671 43.030603864 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102905900954 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367410965738 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661549030197 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926378128447 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114924822517 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.