In many countries, plastic containers have become more popular than ever. They are used in many businesses such as the food and drink industry. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages?
Unprecedented has there been a phenomenon that the manufacturing industry ubiquitously makes use of plastic covers in their products, so-called food and drink as it is seen recently. Notwithstanding some prevailing benefits, the drawbacks overwhelm it's reverse owing to some rational reasons.
Conspicuously, from the economic standpoint, the use of plastic bags has positive contributions to organizations. Plastic items can be effortlessly manufactured by innovative machines, so the owners do not have to splurge much on these products. For instance, there was a survey conducted in Vietnam, comparing the price which the employees had to pay for plastic covers and those for paper bags. Surprisingly, the result signified that instead of using expensive environmentally friendly methods, people favored using the reverse economical one. Moreover, in the consumerism society, food and drink are two items that citizens daily consume, therefore, a large number of elementary containers are required to suit this market, so a malleable bag is an acceptable choice for them.
Conversely, the drawbacks still overshadow the aforementioned benefits, especially on both the environment and mankind’s health. First and foremost, plastic garbage is extremely damaging to biodiversity. According to VTV, which is an official news channel of Vietnam, the enormous malleable waste is posing a threat to the local nature by poisoning the underground, destroying aquatic-related creatures. Second, human beings’ health is endangered by plastic wastes from victuals. Chemical phenomenons occur when plastic waste stays in the water for too long, these toxic substances can be absorbed into the groundwater which residents use for drinking. Consequently, it will cause disease and destroy the immune system, leading to mortalities.
By way of conclusion, plastic containers are bringing tons of disadvantages to the world’s nature, and it is no doubt that its drawbacks override advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-09 | minomeow12 | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | Nguyen Thi Tuong Vy | 70 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | tamle | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-13 | dinhthu05 | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the average hours spent per day in leisure and sports activities by youngest and oldest populations in the US in 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries and shops To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of population aged 65 and above in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Many people are traveling to other countries Why Is it a positive or negative development 67
- Some people store personal and private information online including banking contacts and addresses Is it a positive or negative trend 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 654, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...that citizens daily consume, therefore, a large number of elementary containers are required to s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, for instance, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79180887372 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32779731865 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648464163823 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.842126695 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.214285714 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150550061649 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474426312064 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385786326485 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954131513285 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325638668712 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.