The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
The maps illustrate how the road access to a city hospital changed between 2007 and 2010.
In general, there are various changes during the four-year period, with the disappearance of bus stops and the birth of two roundabouts, a new car park and a bus station.
As we can see in the map of 2007, the hospital road cut the city road and formed an intersection. It also cut the ring road which is around the city hospital. However, it appears that these crossroads was vanished to give way for two roundabouts in 2010.
Coming along with the appearance of roundabouts is the construction of many facilities next to the road which accesses to the city hospital. In 2007, there were two rows of bus stops which go along either side of the hospital road. However, all of them was destroyed so that one modern bus station was erected to the west of the hospital road. In 2010, they divided car park into two separate areas, one for hospital staffs, which was in the old car park site and the other for public, which was in the east of the ring road.
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 86
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44840420677 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1103012548 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388715991222 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185556031837 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138608839024 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281556394251 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169049865648 0.0819641961636 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.