Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative
artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should
be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Art has been embedded into human societies since the dawn of civilization. Some individuals believe that prominent artists should be sponsored by social funds rather than national aids. When it comes to me, I totally advocate this school of thought by elaborating both viewpoints of the issue.
To commence with, the solid sponsors from governments are pivotal for the development of art in general and the livelihood of artists in particular. In fact, every composer has to put the majority of their time as well as limitless endeavor to create a work-of-art, leading them difficult to make money to support themselves as well as their beloved family. Besides, before being well-known and wealthy, hardly do those artists receive any sponsor or aid from the community. For example, according to history, there were lots of famous artists who were only being known after their death in poverty. Artists who are blessed with outstanding talents deserve to live happy and stable life.
In spite of those aforementioned proportions, the national funds that stem from taxation need to be used for the sake of the communities. These days, modern societies have to confront various crises, including starvation, plague, energy, and education. As a result, all the governments have to prioritize their aids to those activities that support human fundamental demands rather than recreational needs. For illustration, the world's biggest poverty crisis in Africa can be solved with only 6 billion US dollars and it definitely comes from state aid from all over the world. Ultimately, the existence and prosperity of humans are the top priority.
All in all, if all factors are contemplated, people can easily reach the conclusion that the limited supports from the government should be used in building sustainable human societies. In my perspective, I believe that people, including me, are always willing to support artists with our money.
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 80
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it is positive while others think it is a negative development Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 84
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the biggest'.
Suggestion: worlds the biggest
...creational needs. For illustration, the worlds biggest poverty crisis in Africa can be solved ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, well, as to, for example, in fact, in general, in particular, as a result, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26860841424 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85393960182 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614886731392 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0627551989 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.533333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165901352074 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549025595615 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550465050556 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109975492165 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431072991145 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.