The Chat below show the percentage of a different type of household waste that is cycle in one City between 1992 and 2002.
The given horizontal bar depicts the volume of household waste recycled in one City from 1992 to 2002.
The most striking feature to be observed is that majority of recycling came from glass and paper where as plastic was a recycled at least.
In the light of evidence, it is a crystal clear that in 1992, Cannes had highest 20% waste which was recycled followed by plastic, paper and glass with near about 9 10, 10% respectively. In 1997, paper led with more than 40% waste which was recycled, whereas glass, canes and plastic occupied second, third and fourth position with approximately 28, 14 and 50% orderly.
Turning to rest of the description, in 2002, the figure of waste of glass, paper and cans for recycling were accounted for around 47, 39 and 20% sequentially. Plastic stood at the lowest position with about 13%. As far as comparisons are concerned, more household waste was recycled in 2002 than 1992 and 1997. Besides this, cans were more recycled in given years than plastic.
- The map shows the changes of an office building between present and the future 78
- Many people try to find a balance between their work and other aspects of their life However few actually achieve this What solution can you suggest 73
- Some people say that to solve today global problem every nation should have a good relationship with other nation to what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 78
- Failure is the proof that desire was not strong enough To what extend do you agree with this statement give reasons for your answer 73
- In some countries people who are unemployed receive a sum of money each week in the form of a benefit While some support this other people believe that this money should not be given Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... of recycling came from glass and paper where as plastic was a recycled at least. In ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, second, so, third, whereas, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82558139535 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51014706561 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598837209302 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7696294731 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13567684133 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774120329426 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982720276427 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11199093917 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108844110304 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.