The pie charts below show some units of household spending in United Kingdom and Canada in 1995 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts represents the comparison of household expenditure by families in the United Kingdom and Canada on different areas in 1995 and 2010.
As it is shown in the illustration, that people in Canada tend to allocate on food and drink while leisure became the biggest proportion in the United Kingdom. Also, almost all of items experienced different changes.
People in the UK spent their budgets on utility bills at 1% lower than Canadian at 27%, but families in the Canada allocated for food and drink was bigger than ones, representing 29% compared with 23%. Families expenditure on vehicles in the UK was 2% lower than people in the Canada, while outlay on leisure was the biggest in the UK and only 18% in the Canada. Also, both of them had the same proportion on other expenditure.
In the next 15 years, household expenditure on leisure became the biggest in the UK, compared with people in the Canada at a half from ones, but Canadian disbursed on utility bills was bigger than British, compared 31% to 28%. While expenditure on food and drink in the UK was 2% lower than Canadian at 15%, and outlay on vehicles in the Canada was 2% higher than British at 14%. Also, two countries had the same rate on other expenditure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-09 | nur pitriyah etika | 79 | view |
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different mode of transport 78
- Many processed foods and ready made meals contain preservatives and chemicals what are the advantages to this do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The table below shows the table made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of school leavers from three schools in the same town who went on to higher or further education Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 54
- More and more people are not eating meals together with their family member Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the demerits 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... People in the UK spent their budgets on utility bills at 1% lower than Canadian ...
^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e UK, compared with people in the Canada at a half from ones, but Canadian disbur...
^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enditure on food and drink in the UK was 2% lower than Canadian at 15%, and outla...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69406392694 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58491856075 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452054794521 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4642749893 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.222222222 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11854755344 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660541002745 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108466672554 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129867515802 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133379163748 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.