Many species of animals all around the world are on the verge of extinction. Some say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying while others say that we should concentrate more on the problems of human beings. Discuss both the views.
Nature has blessed mankind with a variety of flora and fauna. Few proponents assert that nations and residents should work hand-in-hand to save those animals which are on the edge of extinction. While others deem differently by saying that there are other important matters that need immediate consideration. I concur that both the ideologies are true to some extent. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will enunciate my views.
From the former view of subjects, it is comprehended that people and states should come forward to protect the living creatures from being vanished due to some reasons. Primarily, the government can impose stringent laws to concern with the control and preservation of the rare fauna while people can abide these rules in order to save the organisms like rhinos and tigers. Another noteworthy aspect is that the higher authorities and people should raise funds for rendering habitat, healthcare and nutritional diet ensuing to make them feel secure in this world. Lastly, regime can prohibit the poachers, hunters and tourists from interfering the forests so that animals such as panda can breed conveniently without any fear.
From the latter view of subjects, it is apprehended that some other sectors also require attention due to some rationales. The predominant one is the unemployment among the younger section of the society that ultimately enforcing the youngsters to fall prey of untoward activities to earn money. Another grave concern is that pathetic condition of roads and transportation system that make the life of commuters very miserable as they have to put their lives into jeopardy while commuting to their destinations. Last but not least, majority of people are suffering from various health constraints due to different types of pollutants in air, soil and water. Thus higher authorities and people must resolve these troubles in order to become blessing at large.
In the epilogue, I would reckon that both the above-mentioned views are true to certain extent. However, I believe that society should adopt a sagacious approach towards preserving the animal species from passing away by keeping in mind their significance and other menaces those acquire sheer attention in order to gain holistic growth with resplendent walk of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-10 | kirti likhi ludhiana | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-18 | Naheer | 56 | view |
- Big companies should invest in sports and local facilities Agree or disagree 78
- the cost of flying has decreased significantly over the last decade this has made overseas travel much more accessible discuss advantages and disadvantages 78
- Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas in words pictures music film in whichever way they wish There should be no public or government restrictions on what they do 80
- Some schools have restricted mobile phones Is it a positive or a negative development 84
- Big companies should invest in sports and local facilities Agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ls which are on the edge of extinction. While others deem differently by saying that ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e ideologies are true to some extent. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will enunci...
^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s of pollutants in air, soil and water. Thus higher authorities and people must reso...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, so, thus, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30027548209 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79260045069 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619834710744 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2452529744 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211752342909 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567379889239 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483675459852 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12058378261 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352772139948 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.