Some people think that a government should spend money looking for life on other planets while others think that there are many unsolved problems on earth. discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this contemporary epoch, some masses want higher authorities to allocate fund to find life on other planets, while others believe that it is a waste of money as there are other serious concerns such as global warming, starvation, illiteracy and poverty which need to be addressed. Here, I would like to throw light on both views with my perception.
A bunch of points can be mentioned to support the former view. First and foremost, the main reason for finding life on another planet is to find out natural resources that are necessary for the survival of humans. To make it clear, natural resources are at the verge of extinction on our planet due to over exploitation of these resources by humans. Therefore, regime should spend money to do research for life on other planets that have potential to cater for life. Moreover, problem related to scarcity of land have increased significantly due to burgeoning of population. Taking this situation into consideration, government should allocate money to find life on another planet in order to mitigate the problem related to accommodation in future.
Numerous points can be considered to support the latter view. Initially, human are facing several threats such as famine, natural disasters and pollution and these have adverse effect on human life. Consequently, some civilians are of opine that there is a dire need to tackle with these concerns instead of paying attention to space research. Besides this, a massive outlay is required for space exploration and there is no guarantee that we will find other planet that have the potential to cater for life. Needless to say, it is prudent approach to spend money to curb the series problems in order to make planet more livable then finding and other planets to live.
To recapitulate, undeniably, space exploration projects are beneficial to reduce future concerns. But according to my point of view, money should be spent on more pressing issues like health, education, poverty and pollution because they directly impact to the public.
- As people live longer and longer the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality The idea horrifies most people yet it is no longer mere science fiction To what extent do you agree with the such a procedure Have you 78
- Nowadays companies and other organisations are requiring their employees to wear a uniform Think about jobs where uniform is important What are the advantages and disadvantages of wearing a uniform 67
- Some people think that government should invest in arts and cultural events others think that government should invest money on more important things 67
- These days a considerable amount of advertising is directed at children should it be banned because of the adverse effects 78
- Failure is the proof that desire was not strong enough To what extend do you agree with this statement give reasons for your answer 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 740, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...te the problem related to accommodation in future. Numerous points can be considered t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 630, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...ms in order to make planet more livable then finding and other planets to live. T...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10714285714 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73224011654 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53869047619 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4009803833 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.4 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281961777424 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087280865017 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770580997187 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163126699714 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647419927069 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.