Old friends vs new friends?
Controversy exists over whether it is more essential to keep your relationship with your old friends in comparison to finding new friends. I believe, however, keeping your old friends is by far more important than making new friends since they know you far better and can help you in your lives. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint my case.
The first point to mention is that old friends are more familiar with your behaviors and habitats. They know your likes and dislike and know how to treat you in case you have a problem. Moreover, since you have a background together, some of your attitudes is like each other and it enables a person to feel comfortable. Consider a person having a relationship with his childhood friend. Because they spend many of their time together, they can easily socialize with each other, talk about the problem in their lives, and more importantly, they can trust each other which is essential in any relationship.
The further more subtle reason is that old friend care more about their friends and care about their friends well being. They know their friends for a long time and their friends are like family to them. Therefore, when one of their friends is unhappy and has a problem, they assist him to overcome his problem and feel better. Moreover, when people grow up they face challenges that need to advocate time to solve it. Some of it can not be shared with the family members such as fathers and mothers. In this case, old friends can be useful, since they have to face the same challenges and they can understand you better and after that help you to solve it. For example, one of my friends have fallen in love with a girl. Since this was new to him, he did not know what to do and the subject was not something that he could share with his family members. After a while, he told me and I share my experience and help him to make a decision in that matter.
To make a long story short, it is a wise decision to keep your relationship with your old friends rather than to make new friends due to helping people better since they know them and assisting them to solve their challenges.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-12 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | zahrazara | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | sonyeoso | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | fmichela | 60 | view |
- TPO 32 76
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 76
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 65
- TPO4 3
- The extended family is less important now than it was in the past 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54263565891 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37480493283 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441860465116 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.9 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2614542913 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308342389058 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120231507896 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114524546455 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235211077148 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807079757324 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.