Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language.
Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
It is supposed that in the foreseeable future, linguistic homogeneity will be a conspicuous trend in the human world. While it could be a potential breakthrough for humanity, there is a widespread worry that this will lead to the gradual demise of national identity.
Admittedly, it is quite unilateral to ignore the considerable benefits of one world language. Firstly, using the same language can enable people to engage in the international working environment and adapt to the globalization era. It subsequently results in another merit that seasoned employers have a fair chance to demonstrate their ability without facing language barriers. Secondly, a universal language would open avenues to more business opportunities because it promotes understanding and economic cooperation among nations. In this way, the global dialect might bridge the gap between diverse communities, thereby facilitating multinational activities ranging from commerce to tourism.
However, changes in language often reflect the negative changing values of a culture. Language and culture are inextricably linked, with every unique word of a dialect representing local people’s ideas, thinking, and beliefs as well as the length of a country’s heroic history. In other words, the disappearance of a mother tongue would cause a large number of people to sacrifice their core identity since their native tongue is prevailed by a predominant one. Additionally, a tongue plays a prominent part in human beings as it symbolizes their origins and defining characters. For instance, Vietnamese have been known for their heroism and patriotism via words of their national anthem; therefore, they are proud of their rich historical and cultural heritage. Finally, developing a closer relationship with the rest of the world does not necessarily give up indigenous cultures due to their uniqueness and distinctiveness. Thus, it can attract foreign visitors and yield high income.
In conclusion, the trend towards linguistic uniformity would be of benefit to society, but nevertheless, it has posed a threat to human identity and cultural diversity. Social developments lie in differences, not in similarities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-26 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | hieutrungpham7201 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-12 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | quynhhuong656 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-05 | miminguyen | 73 | view |
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university What are the advantages and disadvantages of this tendency 84
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes and effects of this situation 84
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 89
- International travel has many advantages to both travelers and the country visited Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...pearance of a mother tongue would cause a large number of people to sacrifice their core identity...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'but'.
Suggestion: but
...formity would be of benefit to society, but nevertheless, it has posed a threat to human identit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ie in differences, not in similarities.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65454545455 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23131060527 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645454545455 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4683143346 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127719512432 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414266110494 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357268899874 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079540197844 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184589116082 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.