The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
The bar graph illustrates the outcome of a study on the pattern of purchasing and consuming coffee and tea among Australian citizens in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart in the previous four weeks.
Overall, there was a high coffee consumption, either fresh or going to café, in Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart while instant coffee was more common amidst the people of Brisbane and Hobart.
With respect to fresh coffee, there was a high drinking pattern in Sydney and Melbourne with more than 40% of the population buying it. However, Brisbane and Adelaide had the least consumption with less than 35% of the residents buying fresh coffee. Furthermore, while more than 60% of Sydney’s, Melbourne’s and Hobart’s inhabitants preferred going to the café for coffee and tea, only about 55% and roughly half of the population of Brisbane and Adelaide respectively had this habit.
Finally, while more than half of the people residing in Brisbane and Adelaide got instant coffee, less than 50% of the people inhabiting the other three cities took instant coffee during the period. It is interesting to note that, of all the three coffee varieties, most people from the five cities except Adelaide went to the café for coffee.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 61
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 73
- With growing populations in cities more and more people live in homes with little or no outdoor space Do you think this is a positive or negative development 80
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1724137931 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62877932133 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522167487685 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.6949311143 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.0 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186209300249 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900033296179 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313921018004 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108873937528 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272074689362 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.