The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the graph provided delineates fish and meat consumption per person per week from 1979 to 2004.
Looking from an overall consumption, Beef, Lamb and fish have gradually decrease , whereas there’s a dramatic rise in chicken between 1979 to 2004.
To be specific, it is apparently that the consumption of chicken and beef have opposite trend in the given years. Accordingly, beef consumption sharply declines from approximately 220 grams to 180 then reverse to about 240 grams during 1979 to 1984 but later there is a considerable drop to 100 grams for 20 years. Compared to chicken consumption, form beginning it promptly increase roughly 30 grams then little down to 150 grams after 1984 there is an substantially up to 250 grams.
For the lamb and fish consumption, Individuals ate around 52 grams to 48 grams fish per weeks with time, in other words, fish consumption experience slightly change. However, it can be seen that consumption of lamb slide ceaselessly from 150 grams to 60 grams which has greatly fluctuation then fish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | zhao_kangg | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | Trác Ngọc | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | nguyenanhkhoi1702 | 67 | view |
| 2022-04-13 | Carrotte | view | |
| 2021-12-02 | oscar_666 | 78 | view |
- It is often said that children learn best by observing the behavior of their adults and copy it To what extent do you think the given statement is right 11
- In many countries people now wear western style dress such as suits and jeans rather than traditional clothing Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 61
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 73
- With the increase in use of the Internet books will soon become unnecessary To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Some people think that there should be a complete ban on all forms of advertising To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 73, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'decreased'.
Suggestion: decreased
...ion, Beef, Lamb and fish have gradually decrease , whereas there’s a dramatic rise in ch...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f, Lamb and fish have gradually decrease , whereas there’s a dramatic rise in chic...
^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...consumption, form beginning it promptly increase roughly 30 grams then little down to 15...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e down to 150 grams after 1984 there is an substantially up to 250 grams. For the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, but, however, if, look, so, then, whereas, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03448275862 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87523415196 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7524679614 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.142857143 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124835919924 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693921706217 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545202125829 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10013357561 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516384260253 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.