The picture below shows Bell Hill farm in 1976 and the changes that took place in 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The two maps below illustrate the evolution of Bell Hill Environment Center from Bell HIIL farm over the period of 30 years starting in 1976.
Overall, the layout of this location in 1976 was quite the same as the one in 2006. However, there has been some massive modernization in the infrastructure of this place, with almost all the previous farms being converted into an environmental center.
In 1976, there was a crossroad that divided Bell Hill Farm into two different areas, and this was not demolished and remained unchanged in 2006. On the upper left-hand side of the road, in 2006, the storage for farm machinery was renovated into a car parking area. At the same time, on the main territory in the east of the center, the previous farmyard was replaced by a recreational area.
Furthermore, the bam where some plants contain starches, such as corn, was stored in 1976, demolished, and constructed into a multimedia room in 2006. On the south side of the center, the farmhouse was not altered at all, while the cow-sheds and poultry territory on the right side of the center, opposite the zone that accommodates three entertainment locations, were converted into student housing throughout the period given.
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called Pentland from 1950 to 2007 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the diagrams below 74
- The bar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in Canada in 1998 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The pie charts show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 84
- With the increase in the use of mobile phones and computers fewer people are writing letters Some people think that the traditional skill of writing letters will disappear completely To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98536585366 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77260328407 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580487804878 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1964225771 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159627523887 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773531421982 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528443456965 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106660899538 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458929737408 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.