The graph below shows coffee production in four different countries from 1990 to 2010.
The bar chart illustrates how much coffee was manufactured by four different nations from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, it is noticeable that Brazil, Indonesia, and Vietnam were the three countries where the production of coffee has increased over the past four years. In contrast, Colombia was the only nation that coffee production dropped over the period. Furthermore, the amount of coffee produced in Brazil was the highest, while the production of coffee in Vietnam was the lowest.
In terms of coffee manufactured in Brazil and Colombia, Brazil was the largest producer of coffee, with 0.7 million tonnes in 1990. After every five years to the end of the period, Brazil continued to increase the manufacturing of coffee at 1 million tonnes, 1.5 million tonnes and reached a peak of nearly 2 million tonnes in the final years. In contrast, while Colombia was the second country in coffee production behind Brazil at 0.6 million tonnes in 1990, the coffee manufacture of Colombia tended to decrease by 0.1 million tonnes every five years to the end of the period.
As for the coffee production in Indonesia and Vietnam, Vietnam was the country that had the lowest amount of coffee manufactured, at 0.1 million tonnes in 1990. Coffee production in Vietnam remained stable at 0.1 million tonnes in 1995 before increasing to 0.2 million tonnes five years later. In the final years, coffee production in Vietnam increased slightly to 0.3 million tonnes. Meanwhile, Indonesia was the third-largest producer of coffee, at 0.2 million tonnes in 1990 and remained constant at 0.2 million tonnes in 1995. Coffee production in Indonesia increased by 0.1 million tonnes every five years to the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-09 | wholemilk | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | linhchang | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football However others think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The table below shows how much money a single person and a couple in Australia need for a comfortable lifestyle after they retire 76
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football However others think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The charts show information about the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, third, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 280.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10357142857 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66322029636 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.396428571429 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5764812969 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.083333333 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228168366192 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126660212601 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774047046696 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194397839206 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081343134667 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, third, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 280.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10357142857 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66322029636 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.396428571429 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5764812969 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.083333333 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228168366192 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126660212601 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774047046696 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194397839206 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081343134667 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.