Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life. Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals, companies and society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many are of the view that individuals should not be involved in a secure job for life. Others say that the persistence of one's occupation generates values for themselves and the society as a whole. I would concur with the former notion on the grounds of personal development and benefits in the long run.
On the one hand, the option to maintain the current status could be explained by several reasons, chief of which is related to the merits in terms of both relationships between colleagues and financial security for senior positions. Staff who devote the entire worklife to a company witness significant changes in the process of recruitment. Hence, the bonds between those who choose to stay and overcome suffering during the progress of business are strengthened and closer than ever and this reason is owing to human fundamental need of mental well-being and socializing. With regards to a larger context in which the society as well as companies are the beneficiaries, having a stable labor force, which is the key in corporate cohesion, could ensure the domestic operation and at large, the solid corporate structure would contribute to the overall social productivity.
On the other hand, I fervently believe that alternating between occupations could profoundly bring ample opportunities for individuals to develop and sharpen skills in many aspects. While integrating an alien environment, workers are able to cultivate social skills such as communication, presentation and exchanging professions and ideas in different contexts. Furthermore, they may encounter different thinking from diverse perspectives and visions, from peers to managers, which could foster critical thinking and broaden their horizon. Both of the aforementioned factors will result in a dynamic working environment for staff and promote further co-operations, which is in turn beneficial to individuals even when they leave the company. The learnt implications from the previous job could be useful in the upcoming one as long as they could optimize the use of their skill set and seize the opportunities to be the outstandings.
To conclude, although perpetuating the chosen career may be secured in certain aspects, I believe the option to change is more reasonable to nurture the internal qualities of a person at the best conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-19 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-09 | Charles Le | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | Master Panda | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-18 | cynnie.chan | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to four London museums 73
- The diagram below shows how leather goods are produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people believe that violent media directly results in violent behavior To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many doctors recommend that older people exercise regularly but most patients do not follow an exercise routine Why do you think this happens How can people be encouraged to exercise regularly 84
- In some parts of the world it is increasingly popular to research the history of one s own family Why do people want to do this Is it a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ife. Others say that the persistence of ones occupation generates values for themsel...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, then, well, while, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1968.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36239782016 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07508851867 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58583106267 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.890531281 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.384615385 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2307692308 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171946548734 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652325419454 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737743294951 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104484325318 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768985979456 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.