One of the most important issues facing the world today is a shortage of food and some think genetically modified foods are a possible solution.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, famine is a major threat to human wellbeing, which gives some people the idea that genetically engineered foods could be a viable solution to this problem. This is probably a feasible measure to some extent, but I disagree because of its inefficiency of time and money.
The main reason to support the application of genetically modified crops is the improved outputs of certain plants. Thanks to biotechnological breakthroughs, engineers have succeeded in altering physical traits of multiple common plants, rendering them much stronger against drastic weather or harmful insects. For instance, in Vietnam a salt-tolerant rice variety has been created by the governmental engineering group to typically fit the saline soil in the southwest region. The result of this new rice variety lives up to people’s expectations: introducing a means of sustenance for indigenous farmers and also contribute greatly to the productivity of national agriculture.
That said, lengthy time and prohibitive prices are the issues associated with these types of foods. To begin with, it could take several years to conduct experiments, inspections and modifications in the laboratory before a new plant species officially launched into the market. Of course all scientists hope desirable results to their inventions in a fairly short period of time, but there is no guarantee. Some scientific processes could take a decade, and maybe more before the findings are yielded. Finally, new variations of species are usually claimed a monopoly of certain corporations as their intellectual property. Thus, such genetically foods are charged with exorbitant costs which, in most cases, would go beyond consumers’ budget. There seems to be no problems to people who have ample affordability, but to those living below the poverty line, it could be a big financial obstacle.
In conclusion, despite a good notion in harvest enhancement, bioengineered foods really pose a challenge to users. Personally, I think there might be some other possible options to wipe out famine in the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-03 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-17 | Vuthungan | view | |
| 2020-12-03 | kandarajan | 67 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | roham.47 | 84 | view |
- It is widely known that despite cars damage the environment their manufacture and their use continue to increase Why is it the case How can this be controlled 89
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram details the process of producing olive oil 78
- The plans below show the South Wing of Walton Museum in 2008 and 2012 after it was redeveloped Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s to their inventions in a fairly short period of time, but there is no guarantee. Some scient...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, really, so, thus, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, of course, in most cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41104294479 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10318489348 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659509202454 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5362725489 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.6 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150104560707 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443033145437 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496803410569 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948236873139 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545502259379 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.