Some people think that the news media has become much more influential in people’s lives today and it is a negative development. Do you agree or disagree?
The news media has much more influence on people’s lives these days. It is appreciated that this is a detrimental phenomenon. From my perspective, I completely disagree with this opinion and this essay would pen down valid support for my verdict.
Initially, I hold a strong belief that the proliferation of news has exerted a positive impact on people’s choices by helping them make wiser and more thoughtful decisions. Thanks to the democratization of news media, readers can receive news on a daily basis and seek out information from various sources. Consequently, vital references can be easily found and utilized. For example, people are now making more and more conscious votes in elections. This is derived from the fact that politicians often express their perspectives through mass media, which is accessible to most citizens. By contrast, if news media was still in its infancy, individuals would have little choice but to rely on traditional sources of information, such as paper materials being outdated years ago.
Moreover, I opine that the plethora of news encourages people to strengthen their critical thinking to become more cultivated readers. However irritating unavoidable misinformation is, it necessitates all readers to reinforce their verification and judgement ability. According to recent research by the Ministry of Education and Training in Vietnam, approximately 87% of high school students know how to double-check the information before sharing news with others as a result of intensive exposure to various news sources, including both fake and authentic news. Another constructive outcome is that a major percentage of them actively and selectively seek out news from reputable news sources.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, I concur that the profound impact of news on people’s lives is advantageous in terms of contributing to making thoughtful decisions and honing leadership skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-07 | dkhvi | 63 | view |
| 2022-05-06 | dkhvi | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-27 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-01 | phuongchi17899 | 82 | view |
| 2022-02-01 | phuongchi17899 | 73 | view |
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- People in many countries are spending less time with their families What are the reasons and effects of this 78
- As country develops a large population chooses to live individually or live in a small family unit Discuss the causes and its effects on society 73
- Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual people to address We have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment is at an international level To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 136, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...king to become more cultivated readers. However irritating unavoidable misinformation i...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions and honing leadership skills.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, as for, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58528428094 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19317260279 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628762541806 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3803307543 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.285714286 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259433329436 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923457985917 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984369370454 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151716296154 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223834936507 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.