Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argure that there are no accomodation for wild animals living in the 21st century, so it is wasting to spending our resources to protect them. Personally, i completly disagree with this pont of view
In my opinion, it is not accurate to said that there are no place for wild animals live in the 21 st century. On the earth today, a lot of lands that humans have not explored yet, there are many forests that people have never touched their foot in. Therefore, it can’t be true to assume that wild animals dont have any natural habitat to living. Beside that, in terms of awareness, there are more plans and policies than ever to protect and maintain endangered species by a numerous of nations and other organizations. For instance, the number of zoos which had used to protect wild animals grow quickly every year. In addition, authorities also have issued bans about poaching wild animals to save them.
I also believe that protecting wildlife will contribute more resources to society than waste it. The resources that we spend to protect and maintain biodiversity in natural will create more favorable conditions for business activities. Agriculture, for example, if we have plans to maintain the balance of animals in the food chain such as birds and Grasshopper, it will limit the destruction of crops. In terms of reaseachs and educations, groverment has spend a huge of resources such as money, support policies and other favorable conditions for sicentist and people to come up with pratical solutions about improve our life and save endangered species.
In conclusion, i believe that the earth is a common habitat of humans and other animals, so spending resources to protect and maintain them is never wasted it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Aung | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | ielts_tony | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | Charles Le | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters traveling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 306, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n’t be true to assume that wild animals dont have any natural habitat to living. Bes...
^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...easeachs and educations, groverment has spend a huge of resources such as money, supp...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ave endangered species. In conclusion, i believe that the earth is a common habi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94880546075 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67155062236 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535836177474 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6175102647 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.833333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30088786207 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115404979225 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08155732413 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202727527545 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772360628192 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.