Some people think that public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free to the people who use it. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is believed that to encourage more civilians using public transport, the government should fund and make it free. Personally I completely agree with this view because this will provide a two-way benefit, for not only civilians but also the government. The society is more modern and the people should receive more welfare from the country in which they live. Besides, the habit of using public transport of civilians also has a lot of positive effects on the environment.
To begin with, there are two main reasons why some people feel that it is not necessary for government fund money to make public transport become free for people. One reason is that if the government invests the country’s money into public transports, it is very expensive and wasteful. Instead, they can save money for other things which are more necessary such as improving the quality of health, especially in the current covid-19 pandemic, which is very complicated. Furthermore, if the use of public transports is free, it will become low quality. Typical example is Public toilets are free of charge now. It is very dirty and the facilities are seriously degraded. Obviously, the investment of the government can cause some negative effects.
Apart from the practical disadvantages expressed above, I believe that public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free to the people who use it. Firstly, the investment of the government into public transports will let a lot of people use it. When the environment is becoming bad and worse because of the huge emissions from private vehicles, making civilians change their habits, using public transport instead of their vehicles will be one of the best ways to protect the atmosphere. Besides, using public transports will limit the number of traffic accidents which happen everyday by many private vehicles, essentially motorbikes. Secondly, with the growth of society, people should have more social welfare. The free use of public transport helps the community to become connected and loving. Therefore, the government should fund public transport so people can use it for free.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned about, I strongly believe that the investment of the government into growing and making it become free is totally deserved. The benefit for civilians and the development of the country because a country really prospers only when the needs of its people are met and they feel happy living in that country.
- Students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions of this issue 67
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching With the technology available today there is no justification for it and everything should be done online To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- One of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- 2 With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas Surroundings 73
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, apart from, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 408.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11764705882 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69443800362 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460784313725 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.245621563 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391816259987 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138515428925 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120103727738 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230029738839 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128708369383 0.056905535591 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.