Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems?
Together with global development, many countries have made a lot of progress to bring their citizens a wealthy life. Yet, it still has the dark side of the society where there is a giant gap between rich and poor people. From my perspective, this phenomenon exerts negative impacts on our society and human development as the rich become richer while the opposite is true for the poor.
To begin with, the rich-poor gap gives rise to/ culminates in social injustice and an inexorable rise in crime. Due to the enormous gap between rich and poor people, if a person is born in an affluent family, they will receive many wishes from everyone. Conversely, they will be treated unfairly and even looked down upon when living in an impoverished place. This problem can inhibit human development, especially young children who are susceptible to mental well-being as they are discriminated against and isolated by other friends. Thus, they cannot improve themselves to be a good person and a country will not lead an all round development in the future. Moreover, it’s my conviction that most criminals come from a difficult background. Since they aren’t provided with enough conditions to study in any academic institutions and don’t have any competence , they will, in all likelihood, stop at nothing to make ends meet, even carry out illegal activities. Therefore, it will pose a threat to our safety and social life.
In the face of a growing gap between the poor and rich, there is plenty of room for different pragmatic measures to minimize this situation. The first and most important thing is that, people had better endeavour to live in harmony with each other in society. The poor should make a great effort to lead a better life while rich people should not look down upon others and should lend others a hand when they are in desperate need. Finally, the government should organize many campaigns and volunteer activities to support the poor to improve their quality of life.
In conclusion, social injustice and an exponential rise in crime is attributed to the gap between the two classes of society. As a consequence, different down-to-earth methods must be taken as soon as possible to ameliorate this phenomenon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | NUT | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
- The charts below give information about different types of waste diposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011 73
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 78
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world what are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 862, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...stitutions and don’t have any competence , they will, in all likelihood, stop at n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01072386059 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74798286387 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573726541555 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5561614667 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.941176471 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235230689658 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692473993316 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576613685953 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133372072003 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583605237452 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.