Some people say that too much time and resources are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
it is believed that there has been an excessive use of time and resources for the preservation of animals in a wilderness. Although it is true that these animals need to be protected, a vast proportion of humans’ effort should be put into preventing other major environmental problems, such as climate change.
Undeniably, an increasing number of exotic species, ranging from fairly to extremely rare, being driven to extinction are in need of serious protection from humans. Currently, such fauna by and large resides in remote or nondescript areas, such as savannas in Africa where the quality of local people’s life is extremely poor. Such abject poverty often compels the locals to poach rare species for monetary rewards. Consequently, should local governments and global animal rights organizations fail to allocate resources for the deterrence of illegal hunting activities, these animals will certainly be extinct. More importantly, losses of certain animals would have repercussions on humans. For example, the appreciable drops in predators, such as leopards, mean uncontrollable increases in rodent species that can cause severe damages to crops.
However, preserving wild animals should not be our highest priority as global issues, such as climate change are threating the existence of entire species on this planet. Explosive growth of industrial sector as well as the unabated expansion of residential areas have resulted in dramatic emission of harmful chemicals, such as Nitric Oxide. Moreover, the volume of such effluents is ever-increasing and are difficult to safely dissolve. Therefore, were we unable to utilize all our resources for adopting new green energy in industries and successfully eliminate the detrimental effects of dangerous substances being released, there would be a higher frequency of natural hazards. As a result, Holocene extinction could be inevitable, as suggested by many scientists.
in conclusion, despite the importance of saving endangered species, it is of note that a huge amount of our resources should also be reserved for the prevention of climate change.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-27 | minh phương phạm hồng | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-06 | Mina__ | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | nguyentru1993 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | Komaldeep | 26 | view |
- Today people are wasting large amounts of food Why What can be done to reduce the amount of food wasted 95
- Some People Believe That Violence On Television and In Computer Games Has A Damaging Effect On Society Others Deny That These Factors Have Any Significant Influence On People s Behavior Dicuss Both Views and Give Your Opinion 84
- As The Number Of Cars Increases More Money Has To Be Spent On Road System Some People Think That The Government Should Pay For This Others However Think That The Users Should Pay For The Cost Discuss Both Views And Give Your Opinion 61
- Some people say that school children should be mainly taught about the literature e g fiction and poetry of their own country because it is more important than that of other countries To what extent do you agree 90
- only the government action can solve housing shortages in big cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is believed that there has been an exce...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able, as suggested by many scientists. in conclusion, despite the importance of...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...e, as suggested by many scientists. in conclusion, despite the importance of s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, by and large, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5524691358 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05450630445 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623456790123 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0336939581 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0827056454662 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305148373475 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339845653943 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0532110605323 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223655591688 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.