The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The provided pie charts illustrate how annual expenditure of a specific UK school changed in the year 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, there was an increase in the amount of spending in Teachers’ salaries, Furniture and equipment, and Insurance; however, a decline was witnessed in that of Resources and Other workers’ salaries. Also of particular note is that Teachers’ salaries consistently had the highest figures throughout the period, while the opposite was true for Insurance.
Teachers’ salaries made up the greatest amount of total school spending, with 40% in 1981. Then, this experienced a significant rise to a peak at 50% in 1991, before ending the period at 45%. In the meantime, the spending of Furniture and equipment decreased considerably from 15% in 1981 to 5% in 1991, but then substantially increased to 23% in the end. Although the steady growth from 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001 was seen in the amount of Insurance spending, this was the least prime in the amount of total school expenditure.
On the contrary, 28% school expenditure spent in Workers’ salaries in 1981, with a subsequent significant decline to 15% in 2001 .Similar changes could be seen in the amount of Resources spending, with its figure matching that of Furniture and equipment at 15% in the year 1981, decreasing to 9% at the end of the period, despite a small rise in 1991.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 84
- The table below show the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 73
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 78
- The chart shows British emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below give information about different types of waste diposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anged in the year 1981, 1991 and 2001. Overall, there was an increase in the am...
^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... Resources and Other workers’ salaries. Also of particular note is that Teachers’ sa...
^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...quent significant decline to 15% in 2001 .Similar changes could be seen in the amo...
^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Similar
...ent significant decline to 15% in 2001 .Similar changes could be seen in the amount of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98701298701 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93342354083 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.7390466561 43.030603864 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256813012924 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12252321183 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130582255021 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194239017121 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155320770872 0.0819641961636 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anged in the year 1981, 1991 and 2001. Overall, there was an increase in the am...
^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... Resources and Other workers’ salaries. Also of particular note is that Teachers’ sa...
^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...quent significant decline to 15% in 2001 .Similar changes could be seen in the amo...
^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Similar
...ent significant decline to 15% in 2001 .Similar changes could be seen in the amount of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98701298701 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93342354083 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.7390466561 43.030603864 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256813012924 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12252321183 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130582255021 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194239017121 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155320770872 0.0819641961636 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.