The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012.
The given maps shed lights on the reconstruction of a cinema in 2010 and 2012.
As can be seen from the maps, the whole cinema had experienced a remarkable transformation during the two-year period even though there is no additional auditorium seats.
When it comes to the area near the main entrance, which is in the South of the theater, the ticket office, which used to be on the left hand side of the main entrance had been moved to the South-East corner to make room for a new restaurants in 2012. Given the same period, the admin office had been repositioned to the furthest left corner of the customer service zone.
In terms of the North side, in 2010, the small central stage was surrounded by a front auditorium, a back media room and a left-winged storage. While the auditorium stayed intact after two years, the main stage was enlarged with the addition of a brand-new hall at the back. Time period witnessed the relocation of the media and storage to the left-winged and right-winged of the building respectively. Besides, people also erected showers next to the media with a view to satisfy customers’ demand.
- The maps below show a plan of a city in 1950 and at the present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 78
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 11
- The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 67
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79487179487 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82220928002 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.0494558058 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.571428571 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926134126527 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468464964972 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589601776185 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639343318584 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569680208545 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.