Young people who commit crimes should be treated the same way as adults. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Since juvenile delinquency has increased to a greater extent, there is a belief that junior misdoers deserve the same treatment as mature ones. From a personal perspective, the writer sees eye to eye with the above statement in terms of several reasons below.
First and foremost, juvenile criminals should be sentenced based on the essence of their wrongdoings. However old the perpetrator is, it is undeniable that he did commit a crime, and the nature of it remained unchanged. Charging a person's unethical behaviors mercifully due to his young age seems lenient and ludicrous, especially with major crimes like murder or prostitution. Therefore, these watered-down punishments may not have desirable changes in their personality since they may not (concede their mistakes and) endure remorse after committing a crime. As a result, after undergoing the penalties and turning back to society, they will conspicuously pose a dire threat to the community. Therefore, giving adolescent perpetrators the deserved retributions for their misdeeds helps them comprehend and feel guilty for their mistakes; thus, averts the risk of them being the peril of the public once released.
In addition, intensifying junior criminals' penalties enhances the public awareness of children's education. Youngsters are liable to be inadequately influenced by harmful content on the Internet, as they are inexperienced and tend to imitate everything they find intriguing. Once acquiring those disadvantageous perceptions, they may have the potential to perform them in action in real life, which may be considered illicit without their proper apprehension. Hence, parents play a pivotal role in inhibiting the above situation by paying attention to the children's daily routine and helping them differentiate between right and wrong from the beginning of their lives. Not only do parents eradicate the ratio of juvenile delinquency, but they also contribute to the peacefulness of the public community.
In conclusion, concerning the identical evaluation of misdoers among age groups, the writer, from a personal viewpoint, endorses this statement because of some favorable benefits to society.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years 78
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Young people who commit crimes should be treated the same way as adults To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- More and more people no longer read newspaper or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent in terms of several reasons below. First and foremost, juvenile criminals s...
^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...ture of it remained unchanged. Charging a persons unethical behaviors mercifully due to h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the peril of the public once released. In addition, intensifying junior crimina...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... peacefulness of the public community. In conclusion, concerning the identical ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62613981763 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09897760531 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63829787234 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0710845016 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.214285714 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0966324465567 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320676347356 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293980305705 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0460498229142 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360928047069 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.