In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation
In many parts of the world, there is a growing interest among people in tracing the history of the house or building they live in. This situation is probably stem from the curiosity of human, however, there are still many other reasons, perhaps it is a way to assess the safety of their house. In my opinion, learning about the history of where they live can absolutely bring positive effects to people's life. First of all, finding out the background and structure of house or a building gives people a sense of self-satisfaction. For example, a quick survey which is concerned with residents problems in a small town of Sweden showed that searching information of their house can help them to feel more secure about where they live, especially those who live in a house that was built many years ago. Through finding out about the history of their own place, people can check the durability as well as the quality of their house, then decide to continue living or to move out. The detail information can also prevent from being victim of a collapsed house. Second of all, it is related to spiritual matters. Many people believe that living in a good house can bring them fortune and prosperity. In Asian countries, this belief is even stronger when people are willing to spend a large amount of money fixing or redecorating their house to suit "feng sui". It makes them feel more comfortable and satisfy with their own space although sometimes it does not change a lot. From my perspective, knowing more about history of a house can reveal unique and interesting facts that can be helpful for science research or tourism. For instance, a family in the ancient town of Europe found out that their house were built during the World War I. Now, it became a famous place that attracts a lot of tourists every year. In conclusion, the reasons why people are becoming more and more interested in the history of their house come from their assurance and spiritual matters. Until now, this situation almost bring positive effects to people's choice and life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-22 | phuonganhdoan04 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | phuonganhdoan04 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | phuonganhdoan04 | 56 | view |
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Both men and women these days work full time so it is logical for them to share household tasks equallym To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in Why might this be the case Do you think th 56
- The bar chart shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2022 from four village libraries and the pie chart shows the percentage of books by type that were borrowed over this time 56
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'stemmed'.
Suggestion: stemmed
...hey live in. This situation is probably stem from the curiosity of human, however, t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, still, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78991596639 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50748004158 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5111865884 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340328334651 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108010595365 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707604086044 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.340328334651 0.151304729494 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'stemmed'.
Suggestion: stemmed
...hey live in. This situation is probably stem from the curiosity of human, however, t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, still, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78991596639 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50748004158 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5111865884 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340328334651 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108010595365 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707604086044 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.340328334651 0.151304729494 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.